上海滩

这场大会全方位呈现我国机器人产业发展的时代图景_我的网站

一 |     

    Liberia-flagged vessel Front Eagle Photo: Courtesy of China's Supreme People's Court Guangzhou Maritime Court recently successfully mediated a 180 million yuan ($25 million) dispute arising from a collision between two oil tankers in waters near the Strait of Hormuz, with both parties agreeing to apply Chinese law and submit their dispute to the Chinese court, the Global Times learned from the court on Sunday.
In 2025, two crude oil tankers collided at the eastern entrance to the Strait of Hormuz, 24 nautical miles off Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, media reported.
Owned by oil tanker operator Frontline, the Liberia-flagged vessel Front Eagle collided with the Antigua and Barbuda-flagged vessel Adalynn on the morning of June 17, 2025.
The Adalynn was damaged in the fire. While the Front Eagle was undergoing repairs in Shenzhen, South China's Guangdong Province, Global Shipping Holding Ltd., which owns the Adalynn, applied to Guangzhou Maritime Court for its arrest. Frontline provided a cash security of 203 million yuan to release the arrest and applied to establish a limitation fund for maritime claims.
The court approved the application and allowed Frontline to establish the limitation fund, setting the amount of the fund at 168 million yuan.
Guangzhou Maritime Court held four pretrial conferences on October 11, 2025, January 12, May 6 and July 13, 2026 to complete preparations for evidence examination, technical investigations and reported the relevant pretrial arrangements to the provincial high court, the Global Times learned from the court. 
The court held a public hearing for the case on July 14, 2026.
No government agency had conducted an investigation into the collision, and no official findings were issued after the accident. Taking into account the unique burden-of-proof challenges in maritime collision disputes, Guangzhou Maritime Court took measures to preserve key evidence when handling the vessel arrest, including navigation logs, AIS data, voyage data recorder (VDR) records and CCTV footage, the court told the Global Times in a statement on Sunday.
Under a process that involves exchanging evidence inventories, sealing materials simultaneously and jointly reviewing them after evidence submissions, the court helped ensure the authenticity of critical records and laid the groundwork for determining the facts of the case.
As the two sides and their respective maritime experts reached sharply different conclusions over liability, the court introduced a maritime technical investigator mechanism, with the consent of both parties, allowing technical experts to participate throughout the proceedings. Drawing on the preserved evidence, investigators reconstructed the collision, assessed the vessels' encounter situation and clarified the parties' respective responsibilities.
Following the hearing, the court facilitated mediation, and the two parties reached a settlement agreement on July 27, 2026. On July 31, the court organized the distribution of the maritime liability limitation fund among creditors involved in the foreign vessel collision dispute and related charter-party disputes. 
Representatives of the Adalynn traveled from overseas to the court to present a letter of appreciation and a commemorative banner in recognition of the court's efforts, according to the court statement. 
After the Guangzhou Maritime Court accepted the case, both parties agreed to apply Chinese law to establish a maritime liability limitation fund and resolve their substantive dispute, breaking away from the long-standing reliance of international shipping disputes on European and US courts and legal systems.
Choice of justice 
Bilov Viacheslav, a representative of Global Shipping Holding Ltd., told the Global Times that the main reason they chose a Chinese court to mediate the case is that "we want absolutely fair, unbiased approach to this issue. Because nowadays in this world, there are some countries which believe that they are authorized to give instruction to all others, which definitely is having influence on the decisions of the judge on the approach to the case."
Viacheslav gave the Chinese court's handling of the case a five-star rating, saying he had expected the dispute to take at least three years to resolve, but the Chinese court settled it within just one year. He also praised the judges and lawyers for their commitment to advancing the case throughout the proceedings.
"The judges and lawyers worked to advance the case with the same level of commitment as I did, even though the case directly concerned my own interests. This left a deep impression on me about litigation in China," Viacheslav said.
The case involved two foreign parties and a collision that occurred near the Strait of Hormuz, with no direct connection to China or Guangzhou Maritime Court initially. The fact that the parties chose to seek vessel arrest in China and agreed to apply Chinese law demonstrates the credibility and appeal of China's maritime judicial system, Wu Guining, vice president of the Guangzhou Maritime Court, who served as the presiding judge of the case, told the Global Times. 
The court also introduced a maritime technical investigator mechanism in the case, an innovation aimed at addressing complex technical issues arising from vessel collision accidents, Wu said, noting that through technical investigations, the court was able to establish the facts of the case more efficiently, highlighting the integration of professional maritime investigation capabilities with China's specialized maritime adjudication system.
The case demonstrates China's ability to handle major, complex and cross-border maritime disputes with professional expertise, Wu said.
The handling of the collision between the two vessels is just one example of how Chinese courts have been dealing with a growing number of foreign-related maritime cases in recent years.
The Global Times learned from China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) in October last year that over the past 40 years, Chinese courts have handled a total of 88,000 foreign-related maritime cases involving parties from 146 countries and regions.
At a lecture held by the SPC on Friday, Shen Hongyu, director of the Fourth Civil Division of the SPC, told the Global Times that in recent years, Chinese courts have become more influential in participating in and promoting global ocean governance reform. Maritime justice serves as an important instrument for practicing the vision of a maritime community with a shared future and for advancing the reform of the global ocean governance system. 
。    　　讯 8月19日，2026世界机器人大会在北京经济技术开发区（亦庄）北人亦创国际会展中心正式拉开帷幕。作为全球机器人领域很有影响力的行业盛会，吸引了超过300家企业参会参展，预计展品超过3000件，其中首发新品300余件。大会围绕“人机共生，产需共融”主题，集中展示机器人领域技术迭代、产业创新与场景落地的最新成果，搭建开放交流、协同创新的国际化平台，助力机器人产业高质量发展。　　世界机器人大会落地北京亦庄，依托区域完备的产业基础与创新生态，持续发挥永久会址的平台优势，链接全球创新资源，推动前沿技术走出实验室、走向广阔市场。本届大会设置论坛会议、博览展示、机器人大赛、特色配套活动等多元板块，兼顾前沿思想碰撞、产业成果展示、技术竞技比拼与大众科普体验，全方位呈现我国机器人产业发展的时代图景。　　走进博览会现场，前沿创新成果集中呈现。具身智能成为本届大会备受关注的发展方向，人形机器人运动控制、环境感知、人机交互能力持续提升，从概念演示逐步转向务实应用，既可以完成复杂环境下的动作挑战，也能够适配家庭陪伴、作业辅助等现实场景。

二 | 展区内，工业机器人、服务机器人、特种机器人等各展所长，覆盖先进制造、仓储物流、医疗康养、应急防护、民生消费等诸多领域。不少企业带来系统性解决方案，不再局限于单机性能展示，更加注重技术与真实生产生活需求的对接，折射出行业从技术探索向应用落地转变的鲜明趋势。　　大会着力打通产需对接通道，促进技术创新与市场需求双向奔赴。现场打造特色机器人消费体验场景，把机器人消费应用直观带到公众面前，让普通民众近距离感受科技给日常生活带来的改变，拉近尖端科技与大众之间的距离。

三 | 多场专题论坛并行开展，行业专家、企业家、科研工作者围绕技术攻关、产业链协同、商业模式创新、伦理治理等议题开展深度研讨，分享行业洞察，凝聚发展共识。大会同步发布行业发展相关倡议，倡导机器人技术向上向善发展，坚持科技为民的价值导向，让技术进步更好服务于人、造福社会。　　国际交流合作是本次大会的重要底色。来自全球多个国家和地区的机构、企业参与其中，开展技术交流与产业对接，传递开放合作的行业理念。机器人是全球性的科技赛道，技术突破、产业演进离不开各国协同发力。大会为全球机器人从业者搭建对话桥梁，促进创新要素流动，共同应对产业发展过程中的机遇与挑战，推动构建开放共赢的全球机器人产业生态。　　与此同时，世界机器人大赛同步开展，广大参赛选手同台竞技。

四 | 赛事既是技术能力的比拼，也是人才培育的实践载体，激发青年群体对机器人科学的探索热情，夯实产业人才根基，为行业持续发展积蓄后备力量。

五 | 　　当前，机器人作为人工智能连接物理世界的重要载体，正处在加速演进的关键阶段，对赋能实体经济、改善民生福祉意义重大。北京亦庄持续完善机器人产业生态，集聚创新主体，强化创新链条，为产业成长提供有力支撑。

六 | 版权申明：凡注有“”或电头为“”的稿件，均为独家版权所有，未经许可不得转载或镜像；授权转载必须注明来源为“”，并保留“”的电头。    。

七 |

Current article:http://israi1l.cuozubeishenjingli.cfd/news/20260826_9248879.html

Published on:17:48:39